Biden's 'sucker punch' to the 'still-rebounding economy'

A sparse and socially distanced audience at the inauguration of President Joe Biden at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 20, 2021. (Video screenshot)

[Editor’s note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Markets.]

By Andrew Wilford
Real Clear Markets

Just over three months into his presidency, Joe Biden has been nothing if not active. Fresh off proposing two bills that could end up costing taxpayers $5 trillion over the next decade, the President is now proposing yet another $1.5 trillion spending package. This plan, intended to fund expanded childcare and education initiatives, would include huge tax hikes that would act as yet another sucker punch to a still-rebounding economy.

About the only tax increases the President hasn’t supported thus far are wealth taxes and financial transaction taxes. But just because the tax hikes in this package are less exotic doesn’t mean they wouldn’t prove to be harmful.

In keeping with Biden’s ongoing efforts to undo the 2017 tax reform law, the first tax increase proposed is the restoration of the top tax bracket to 39.6 percent, the level it was at before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) lowered the rate to 37 percent. The top individual rate isn’t the most influential piece of the tax code on economic growth — as the Tax Foundation estimated prior to the passage of the TCJA — but it’s also far from the only tax hike that Biden is proposing.

Another, even more harmful proposal that the President is pushing for would be the taxation of capital gains income as ordinary income for taxpayers with over $1 million in income. This would effectively raise the tax rate that capital gains income faces from 20 percent to 39.6 percent. When combined with state and local rates, the top capital gains rate in the nation would rise above 58 percent in places like New York.

Though proponents of such a hike often argue that capital gains receive a “preferential rate,” in truth this lower tax rate is intended to partially offset the fact that capital gains taxes are often a form of double taxation. Income from stocks taxed as capital gains income has already been taxed through the corporate tax code, meaning that by the time it reaches an individual as capital gains income it is facing its second round of taxation.

That’s not the only reason to avoid increasing taxes on capital gains. Higher taxes on capital gains discourage both saving and investment, a bias which is only amplified when one considers that taxes on capital gains also fall upon nominal gains earned due to inflation as well as real gains.

Another proposed tax increase would target the death tax. The President’s proposal may well include a death tax rate increase as well, but it almost certainly will include the removal of the so-called “step up in basis.” The cost basis step-up allows heirs to receive assets with a cost basis of when they acquired the asset, not when the original owner acquired it.

Though this tax policy mechanism is imperfect, it prevents heirs from facing massive tax bills upon selling inherited assets and reduces the bite of the death tax somewhat. That’s an important compromise given the inherent unfairness and complexity of a tax on estates.

Should the President seek to increase the death tax rate, this would only extend the damage it already poses to the economy. By encouraging owners of estates to sell off and shield assets, the tax disincentivizes saving and investment while propping up an economically unhelpful industry of estate tax planning. Policymakers should be seeking to reduce the tax burden faced when someone dies, not expand it.

And keep in mind that if the President gets his way, these tax hikes will be combined with other increases from previous proposals. So along with the aforementioned changes, the economy would also have to deal with multiple forms of corporate tax hikes including a rate increase, global minimum taxes and domestic minimum book taxes, and the loss of other credits and deductions businesses currently benefit from.

In response to a global pandemic, President Biden has chosen to shift the country’s tax-and-spend proclivities into overdrive. Lawmakers would be wise to avoid this impulse and keep America’s tax burden manageable and competitive.

Andrew Wilford is a policy analyst with the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to tax policy research and education at all levels of government. 

[Editor’s note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Markets.]

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

The post Biden's 'sucker punch' to the 'still-rebounding economy' appeared first on WND.

Source: World Net Daily

 10 total views,  1 views today

About WND News Services

Leave a Reply

If providing this article has been helpful for you, please consider a donation.